In a space where free-ranging of livestock enables households to commute to off-farm jobs, but where this risks attack by predator species, what encouragements lead to the best outcomes for livestock and for households?
As climate shifts and development drive humans and elephants toward sharing more of the same spaces and resources, what interventions offer the most for human-elephant coexistence?
Can dynamic PES programs that shift from actions-based to outcomes-based payments provide better PES outcomes (through improved innovation, engagement, and discovery) than any static PES payment structure?
Can playing both sides (upstream and downstream) of a water basin sharing dilemma shift how participants who live in these dilemmas consider the problem?
In a space where farmers can choose non-lethal control (pushing animals onto their neighbors), lethal control, or the coordinated set aside of some land as habitat, how do different groups choose (and can lethal control be discouraged)?
In a world where farmers could do just as well by coordinating around natural enemy services as by spraying, what kind of encouragements are necessary for them to actually try?
